WALKER v. TILTON, 302 Fed.Appx. 754 (9th Cir. 2008)
Harold WALKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James TILTON, Director ofC.D.C.R., Respondent-Appellee.
No. 08-16261.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Submitted December 1, 2008.[fn*]
Filed December 9, 2008.
[fn*] The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P.34(a)(2).
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Harold Walker, Wasco, CA, pro se.
Andrew R. Woodrow, Esq., Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General (SAC) Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 1:07-cv-01256-AWI.
Before: GOODWIN, CLIFTON and BEA, Circuit Judges.Page 755
MEMORANDUM[fn**]
[fn**] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Upon review of the record and appellant's opening brief, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court's order denying appellant's request for preliminary injunctive relief.See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).
All pending motions are denied.
AFFIRMED.