ANAYA-ORTIZ v. MUKASEY, 311 Fed.Appx. 16 (9th Cir. 2009)
Virgilio ANAYA-ORTIZ, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, AttorneyGeneral, Respondent.
No. 03-74666.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
January 27, 2009.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Gary Finn, Esquire, Law Offices of Gary Finn, Indio, CA, for Petitioner.
CAS-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Jennifer Keenery, Esquire, Melissa Lynn Neiman-Kelting, Trial, Oil, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: BERZON and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and SINGLETON,[fn*] Senior District Judge.
[fn*] The Honorable James K. Singleton, United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.
ORDER
The memorandum disposition filed August 27, 2007 is withdrawn. We replace it with a published opinion, filed concurrently with this order.
Anaya's petition for panel rehearing is denied. The parties may file new petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc in accordance with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.