MILLER v. KING HARRIS PUBLICATIONS MAG., 334 Fed.Appx. 114 (9th Cir. 2009)
Ernest MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KING HARRIS PUBLICATIONSMAGAZINE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-15854.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Submitted September 14, 2009.
Filed October 13, 2009.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
Ernest Miller, Susanville, CA, pro se.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Lawrence J. O'Neill, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 1:07-CV-01152-LJOGSA.
Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.Page 115
MEMORANDUM[fn*]
[fn*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
California prisoner Ernest Miller appeals pro se from the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 action seeking damages from King Harris Publications Magazine, a private magazine publisher. Miller contends that King Harris Publications failed to provide him either with his one-year magazine subscription after he placed and paid for the order or a refund of $12.00. Miller contends that King Harris Publications treated him in this manner because he is a black male.
We affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations, filed on March 3, 2008,2008 WL 618809, and adopted by the district court on March 12, 2008.[fn1]
AFFIRMED.
[fn1] All pending motions are denied as moot.