U.S. v. WAYNE, 228 Fed.Appx. 720 (9th Cir. 2007)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick Russell WAYNE,a.k.a. Randy Lance Hall, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-10180.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Submitted April 16, 2007.[fn*]
Filed April 18, 2007.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.][fn*] This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P.34(a)(2).
Michael T. Morrissey, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Philip A. Seplow, Esq., Law Offices of Philip A. Seplow, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-90-00388-SMM.
Before: O'SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM[fn**]
Patrick Russell Wayne appeals from the district court's order revoking his supervised release and imposing a 37-month sentence.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Wayne has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Wayne has filed a pro se brief. No government brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record and briefs, pursuant toPenson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-34, 109 S.Ct. 346,102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.
Accordingly, we GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court's order.
[fn**] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.Page 721