DELGADO-PORTILLO v. GONZALES, 222 Fed.Appx. 620 (9th Cir. 2007)
Carlos Obidio DELGADO-PORTILLO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES,Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-71919.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Submitted February 20, 2007.[fn*]
Filed February 26, 2007.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.][fn*] This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P.34(a)(2).
Carlos Obidio Delgado-Portillo, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
CAC-District, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A78-536-477.
Before: GOODWIN, TASHIMA and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM[fn**]
This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' March 27, 2006 order.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner's motion to reopen, in light of the fact that petitioner did not offer sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie
case for relief. See Khourassany v. INS,208 F.3d 1096, 1099 (9th Cir. 2000).
Accordingly, respondent's unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton,693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
[fn**] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.