U.S. v. RAMIREZ-SOLIS, 285 Fed.Appx. 406 (9th Cir. 2008)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David RAMIREZ-SOLIS,Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-10235.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Submitted June 18, 2008.[fn*]
Filed July 9, 2008.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.][fn*] This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P.34(a)(2).
Bruce M. Ferg, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Francisco Leon, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Frank R. Zapata, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-01457-FRZ.
Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM[fn**]
[fn**] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
David Ramirez-Solis appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. ยง 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v.California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493
(1967), appellant's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v.Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300
(1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.