LEWIS v. NEWHOPE, 224 Fed.Appx. 89 (2nd Cir. 2007)
Regina LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEWHOPE FAMILY SERVICES ADOPTIONAGENCY, formerly known as Evangelical Adoption Agency, Judy Geyer, asExecutive Director of Newhope Family Services Adoption Agency,Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-0757-cv.United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 16, 2007.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Sharpe, J.), it is herebyORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Regina Lewis, pro se, Newburgh, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Michael J. Rusing, Rusing Lopez, P.L.L.C., Tuscon, AZ, for Defendants-Appellees.
PRESENT: Hon. WILFRED FEINBERG, Hon. JOSEPH M. McLAUGHLIN, Hon. guido CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-Appellant Regina Lewis appeals from a judgment of the district court dismissing her complaint against defendants-appellees. We presume the parties' familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and scope of the issues presented on appeal.
We affirm for substantially the reasons given by the district court. To the extent that Lewis intended to raise a claim under42 U.S.C. ยง 1983, she waived that claim by not briefing it on appeal. See LoSacco v. City of Middletown,71 F.3d 88, 92-93 (2d Cir. 1995). We have carefully considered all of Lewis's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit because none of them lie within the jurisdiction of this court. The judgment of the district court is thereforeAFFIRMED.[fn1]
[fn1] Because we affirm the district court, we also deny Lewis's motion for a judicial subpoena.Page 90