Rutgers Law

New Jersey Statutes, Title: 32, INTERSTATE AND PORT AUTHORITIES AND COMMISSIONS

    Chapter 31:

      Section: 32:31-6: Host state selection; development and operation of regional facilities

           Article V. Host State Selection and Development and Operation of Regional Facilities

a. The commission shall develop, adopt, maintain, and implement a regional management plan to ensure the safe and efficient management of waste within the region. The plan shall include the following:

(1) A current inventory of all generators within the region;

(2) A current inventory of all facilities within the region, including information on the size, capacity, location, specific waste being handled, and projected useful life of each facility;

(3) Consistent with considerations for public health and safety as defined by appropriate regulatory authorities, a determination of the type and number of regional facilities which are presently necessary and projected to be necessary to manage waste generated within the region;

(4) Reference guidelines, as defined by appropriate regulatory authorities, for the party states for establishing the criteria and procedures to evaluate locations for regional facilities.

b. The commission shall develop and adopt criteria and procedures for reviewing a party state which volunteers to host a regional facility within its borders. These criteria shall be developed with public notice and shall include the following factors: the capability of the volunteering party state to host a regional facility in a timely manner and to ensure its post-closure observation and maintenance, and institutional control; and the anticipated economic feasibility of the proposed facility.

(1) Any party state may volunteer to host a regional facility within its borders. The commission may set terms and conditions to encourage a party state to volunteer to be the first host state.

(2) Consistent with the review required above, the commission shall, upon a two-thirds affirmative vote, designate a volunteering party state to serve as a host state.

c. If all regional facilities required by the regional management plan are not developed pursuant to section b., or upon notification that an existing facility will be closed, or upon determination that an additional regional facility is or may be required, the commission shall convene to consider designation of a host state.

(1) The commission shall develop and adopt procedures for designating a party state to be a host state for a regional facility. The commission shall base its decision on the following criteria:

(a) the health, safety and welfare of citizens of the party states as defined by the appropriate regulatory authorities;

(b) the environmental, economic, and social effects of a regional facility on the party states;

The commission shall also base its decision on the following criteria:

(c) economic benefits and costs;

(d) the volumes and types of waste generated within each party state;

(e) the minimization of waste transportation; and

(f) the existence of regional facilities within the party states.

(2) Following its established criteria and procedures, the commission shall designate by a two-thirds affirmative vote a party state to serve as a host state. A current host state shall have the right of first refusal for a succeeding regional facility.

(3) The commission shall conduct such hearings and studies, and take such evidence and testimony as is required by its approved procedures prior to designating a host state. Public hearings shall be held upon request in each candidate host state prior to final evaluation and selection.

(4) A party state which has been designated as a host state by the commission and which fails to fulfill its obligations as a host state may have its privileges under the compact suspended or membership in the compact revoked by the commission.

d. Each host state shall be responsible for the timely identification of a site and the timely development and operation of a regional facility. The proposed facility shall meet geologic, environmental and economic criteria which shall not conflict with applicable federal and host state laws and regulations.

(1) To the extent not prohibited by federal law, a host state may regulate and license any facility within its borders.

(2) To the extent not prohibited by federal law, a host state shall ensure the safe operation, closure, post-closure observation and maintenance, and institutional control of a facility, including adequate financial assurances by the operator and adequate emergency response procedures. It shall periodically review and report to the commission on the status of the post-closure and institutional control funds and the remaining useful life of the facility.

(3) A host state shall solicit comments from each party state and the commission regarding the siting, operation, financial assurances, closure, post-closure observation and maintenance, and institutional control of a regional facility.

e. A host state intending to close a regional facility within its borders shall notify the commission in writing of its intention and the reasons therefor.

(1) Except as otherwise provided, notification shall be given to the commission at least five years prior to the scheduled date of closure.

(2) A host state may close a regional facility within its borders in the event of an emergency or if a condition exists which constitutes a substantial threat to public health and safety. A host state shall notify the commission in writing within three days of its action and shall, within 30 working days, show justification for the closing.

(3) In the event that a regional facility closes before an additional or new facility becomes operational, the commission shall make interim arrangements for the storage or disposal of waste generated within the region until such time that a new regional facility is operational.

f. Fees and surcharges shall be imposed equitably upon all users of a regional facility, based upon criteria established by the commission.

(1) A host state shall, according to its lawful administrative procedures, approve fee schedules to be charged to all users of the regional facility within its borders. Except as provided herein, the fee schedules shall be established by the operator of a regional facility, under applicable state regulations, and shall be reasonable and sufficient to cover all costs related to the development, operation, closure, post-closure observation and maintenance, institutional control of the regional facility. The host state shall determine a schedule for contributions to the post-closure observation and maintenance, and institutional control funds. The fee schedules shall not be approved unless the commission has been given reasonable opportunity to review and make recommendations on the proposed fee schedules.

(2) A host state may, according to its lawful administrative procedures, impose a state surcharge per unit of waste received at any regional facility within its borders. The state surcharge shall be in addition to the fees charged for waste management. The surcharge shall be sufficient to cover all reasonable costs associated with administration and regulation of the facility. The surcharge shall not be established unless the commission has been provided reasonable opportunity to review and make recommendations on the proposed state surcharge.

(3) The commission shall impose a commission surcharge per unit of waste received at any regional facility. The total moneys collected shall be adequate to pay the costs and expenses of the commission and shall be remitted to the commission on a timely basis as determined by the commission. The surcharge may be increased or decreased as the commission deems necessary.

(4) Nothing herein shall be construed to limit the ability of the host state, or the political subdivision in which the regional facility is situated, to impose surcharges for purposes including, but not limited to, host community compensation and host community development incentives. The surcharges shall be reasonable and shall not be imposed unless the commission has been provided reasonable opportunity to review and make recommendations on the proposed surcharge. A surcharge may be recovered through the approved fee and surcharge schedules provided for in this section.

L.1983, c. 329, s. 2, Art. V, eff. Sept. 1, 1983.



This section added to the Rutgers Database: 2012-09-26 13:37:50.

Older versions of 32:31-6 (if available):

Court decisions that cite this statute: CLICK HERE.